“Is it third-party tested?” is one of the most common questions about compounded GLP-1 medication — and one of the hardest to answer honestly, because most programs say very little about it in public. This page does the narrow, useful thing: for each compounded GLP-1 program we track, it reports what the company itself states about third-party testing, whether a public certificate of analysis (COA) or named lab is available, and how you can request one.
Two ground rules keep this fair. First, every testing statement below is attributed— it is the company’s own claim, which we report but did not independently verify. Second, and just as important: the absence of a public COA is not evidence that a program doesn’t test. Legitimate 503A and 503B compounding pharmacies routinely run potency, sterility, and purity tests and hand a COA to patients or prescribers on requestrather than posting it on a marketing page. So we don’t treat “no COA on the site” as a mark against anyone. We treat it as your cue to ask.
The honest takeaway: as of 2026-07-14, none of these programs publish a verifiable public COA or name an independent testing lab on their website. That is a transparency gap across the category — not proof that any one of them fails to test. Below the table we show you exactly how to request and read a COA yourself, so you can vet any program on its own evidence.
What each program says about third-party testing
| Program | What it claims about third-party testing (attributed) | Public COA / named lab? | How to request a COA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oak | Oak states on its weight-loss page that it third-party tests every batch for purity and potency. | No public COA / no named lab No named lab and no downloadable COA located on Oak’s public pages (as of 2026-07-14). We report Oak’s statement as its own claim; we could not independently confirm it. | Ask Oak support (or the dispensing pharmacy Oak names at intake) for the certificate of analysis for your specific batch/lot before your first shipment. |
| bmiMD | bmiMD states its medication is “independently verified in FDA- and DEA-registered labs,” and shows a Potency / Sterility / Endotoxicity / pH results table marked “Passed.” | Summary results table only (no COA / no named lab) A summary “Passed” results table appears on bmiMD’s product pages, but no named third-party lab and no downloadable per-batch COA. We report this as bmiMD’s stated claim, not RY-verified fact. | Email bmiMD (orders@bmimd.com) and ask for the certificate of analysis for your lot from Precision Compounding Pharmacy (the 503A pharmacy bmiMD names in its Terms of Use). |
| Strut Health | Strut Health makes no third-party lab-testing claim. Its site shows a PCAB (Pharmacy Compounding Accreditation Board) seal — that is pharmacy-level accreditation, not a per-batch potency/purity test. | None posted — request from pharmacy No public COA is posted. A PCAB-accredited pharmacy is generally able to provide a certificate of analysis on request — its absence from the website is not evidence that testing does not happen. | Ask Strut Health support for the dispensing pharmacy’s COA for your compounded batch; PCAB-accredited pharmacies typically supply one when a patient requests it. |
| Trimi | Trimi makes no third-party lab-testing claim. It discloses that prescriptions are prepared by “state-licensed 503A compounding pharmacies” but does not name a specific pharmacy. | None posted — request from pharmacy No public COA and no named pharmacy. A 503A pharmacy can typically provide a certificate of analysis on request; absence from the site is not proof of anything either way. | Ask Trimi (or its clinical network, Arora Health) which 503A pharmacy fills your prescription, then request that pharmacy’s COA for your batch. |
| Gala GLP-1 | Gala GLP-1 makes no third-party lab-testing claim. It states it uses “a wide network of pharmacies across all 50 states” but names no pharmacy and no lab. | None posted — request from pharmacy No public COA and no named pharmacy. As with any compounded program, a COA can usually be requested from the pharmacy that fills the order. | Ask Gala support which pharmacy fills your order and request that pharmacy’s certificate of analysis for your batch before shipment. |
We also checked telos, which makes no third-party-testing claim on its site; it is not in the table because it does not currently list a verifiable public price and isn’t in our ranked registry.
How to vet a COA yourself (in 5 steps)
You don’t need to take any program’s word for it. Here is how to get and read the evidence that actually matters — a certificate of analysis for the batch you receive.
- Ask before you pay. Message the program (or, at intake, the dispensing pharmacy it names) and request the certificate of analysis for your batch/lot. A straightforward, transparent program will provide one or explain how.
- Check that the COA names the lab.A meaningful COA identifies the testing laboratory — not just the pharmacy. “Independently verified” with no lab named is a claim, not a document.
- Match the lot number.The COA’s lot number should match the vial or package you were sent. A COA for a different batch doesn’t tell you about your medication.
- Read the potency result. Potency shows how close the measured amount of active ingredient is to the labeled amount. For injectables, also look for sterility and endotoxin results.
- Separate accreditation from testing.A PCAB accreditation or a 503A/503B designation is facility-level standing; a COA is a per-batch test. Ask about both, and don’t let one substitute for the other.
Why we don’t issue a verdict
It would be easy — and misleading — to turn this into a “none of them really test” headline. We won’t, because we don’t have the evidence to say it, and it isn’t true that a missing public COA means missing testing. What we can do honestly is report each company’s stated position, show you where the public evidence stops, and hand you the checklist to get the rest. For any medication decision, confirm the specifics with the provider and your prescriber.
Frequently asked questions
Do any of these compounded GLP-1 programs publish a third-party lab report?
As of July 14, 2026, none of the programs we checked publish a verifiable public certificate of analysis (COA) or name an independent testing lab on their website. Two programs make a testing-related claim (Oak says it third-party tests every batch; bmiMD says its medication is independently verified in FDA- and DEA-registered labs and shows a “Passed” results table), and three (Strut Health, Trimi, Gala) make no third-party-testing claim at all. We report each of these as the company’s own statement — we did not independently confirm any of them, and the absence of a posted COA is not evidence that testing does not happen.
Does “no public COA” mean a program doesn’t test its medication?
No. This is the single most misread point. Legitimate 503A and 503B compounding pharmacies routinely perform potency, sterility, and purity testing and provide a certificate of analysis to patients or prescribers on request, rather than posting it publicly. A missing COA on a marketing site tells you the company hasn’t chosen to publish one — not that testing didn’t occur. The right move is to request the COA, not to assume the worst.
What is a certificate of analysis (COA), and what should it show?
A COA is a lab document for a specific batch (lot) of medication. A useful COA identifies the testing lab, the lot number, the active ingredient and its measured potency (how close the actual amount is to the labeled amount), and results for sterility and endotoxins for injectables. If a program gives you a COA, check that it names the lab, matches your lot number, and reports potency within an acceptable range.
What’s the difference between pharmacy accreditation and batch testing?
They are not the same thing. A PCAB accreditation or a 503A/503B designation describes the pharmacy’s standards and oversight — it is facility-level. A certificate of analysis is a test of a specific batch you receive. A program can hold a well-regarded pharmacy accreditation and still not post per-batch COAs, and vice versa. When you vet a program, ask about both.
How is this different from a “which programs are safe” verdict?
We deliberately don’t issue a verdict. This page reports what each company states about testing, whether a public COA exists, and how to get one — so you can vet a program yourself. We attribute every claim and we don’t assert that any program does or does not test based on what is or isn’t posted online. For medication decisions, confirm the specifics with the provider and your prescriber.
Related guides
RangeYourself is reader-supported and may earn a commission when you click certain links — at no extra cost to you. Editorial recommendations are made independently. Testing claims on this page are each company’s own statements, reported as attributed claims and not independently verified by RangeYourself. This content is informational and not medical advice; confirm any medication details with the provider and your prescriber.