Which Proxy Providers Publish a Per-GB Rate You Can Actually Reach
Updated August 7, 2026 · 8 providers checked against their own pricing pages
7 of the 8 providers here advertise a per-gigabyte rate, and 6 of them will not sell it to you on your first day. The advertised rates run from $0.49 to $2.50 a GB. The rate a new buyer actually pays for the same product is between 1.0 and 5.9 times that, depending on the provider, and the difference is a monthly commitment, a volume floor, or a coupon code the page prints rather than applies. Evomi is the one exception here: its advertised rate is what anyone pays, with or without a commitment. All of it is published: every figure below is on the provider’s own site, usually a scroll apart from the other one. What the category does not do is put the two next to each other, which is the only thing this page does.
A per-gigabyte rate on its own is not a price. Every rate on this page is printed with the volume and the commitment that unlock it, because in this category the advertised figure is almost always the cell in a tier table that sits behind the largest plan a vendor sells — and at one provider here, behind a coupon code as well. Rates are for rotating residential traffic unless the product name says otherwise; static, ISP and datacenter proxies are priced per IP per month and scraping APIs per request, and none of those is converted into a per-GB figure here.
RangeYourself has no affiliate relationship with any provider on this page as of August 7, 2026: every link here goes straight to the provider’s own site and earns us nothing. We may pursue one in this category, and if we do we will say so here. Either way the ordering follows published rates, and a provider that pays nothing is listed on exactly the same basis as one that does. See how we make money and our editorial standards.
Advertised against real, provider by provider
Ranked by advertised rate, cheapest advertised first, so the ordering is the one a buyer arrives with. The column that matters is the last one.
| Provider | Advertised rate | What unlocks it | Entry rate | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evomi | $0.49/GB | $49.99 a month “100GB /month $49.99 /month $0.49 /per extra GB” | $0.49/GB no monthly commitment | 1.0x |
| SOAX | From $0.85/GB | $3,000 a month “from $ 0.85 /GB 0..5 TB → $ 0.85 /GB 5..15 TB → $ 0.75 /GB 15 TB+ → $ 0.50 /GB” | $5/GB no monthly commitment | 5.9x |
| Webshare | $1.40/GB | $4,200 a month “3,000 GB Save 80% $7.00 $1.40 /GB $4,200.00 21,000.00 billed monthly” | $3.50/GB $3.50 a month | 2.5x |
| IPRoyal | From $1.75/GB | a volume the vendor states as 10 TB “Custom plans $1.75 /GB Buy Now $1.75/GB available from 10 TB (10,000 GB)” | $5.51/GB no monthly commitment | 3.1x |
| Decodo | $2/GB | $2,000 a month “"title":"1000 GB","discount":null,"discountLabel":null,"price":2,"priceOld":null,"pricePer":"GB","priceTotal":2000” | $4/GB no monthly commitment | 2.0x |
| Bright Data | $2.50/GB | $1,999 a month and the code RESIGB50 “798 GB Included $5 $2.50 / GB $1999 Billed monthly” | $4/GB no monthly commitment | 1.6x |
| Oxylabs | $2.50/GB | $2,500 a month “Corporate 1TB $ 2.50 / GB $ 2,500 billed monthly VAT may apply” | $6/GB $30 a month | 2.4x |
| Zyte | No per-GB rate | The full matrix is in the served HTML: five website-difficulty tiers by two response types by four commitment levels, forty published rates, plus an enterprise level priced on request. | Not published | — |
What each advertised rate actually requires
- Evomi, $0.49 a GB: requires $49.99 a month carrying 100 GB. Its own words: “100GB /month $49.99 /month $0.49 /per extra GB”
- SOAX, $0.85 a GB: requires $3,000 a month. Its own words: “from $ 0.85 /GB 0..5 TB → $ 0.85 /GB 5..15 TB → $ 0.75 /GB 15 TB+ → $ 0.50 /GB”
- Webshare, $1.40 a GB: requires $4,200 a month carrying 3000 GB. Its own words: “3,000 GB Save 80% $7.00 $1.40 /GB $4,200.00 21,000.00 billed monthly”
- IPRoyal, $1.75 a GB: requires a volume the provider itself states as 10 TB, which is the only place in this index a provider publishes that threshold. Its own words: “Custom plans $1.75 /GB Buy Now $1.75/GB available from 10 TB (10,000 GB)”
- Decodo, $2 a GB: requires $2,000 a month carrying 1000 GB. Its own words: “"title":"1000 GB","discount":null,"discountLabel":null,"price":2,"priceOld":null,"pricePer":"GB","priceTotal":2000”
- Bright Data, $2.50 a GB: requires $1,999 a month carrying 798 GB, plus the code RESIGB50 the page prints rather than applies. Its own words: “798 GB Included $5 $2.50 / GB $1999 Billed monthly”
- Oxylabs, $2.50 a GB: requires $2,500 a month carrying 1000 GB. Its own words: “Corporate 1TB $ 2.50 / GB $ 2,500 billed monthly VAT may apply”
- Zyte: publishes no per-gigabyte rate at all, so there is no advertised figure to reach.
Who publishes a rate at a volume you might buy
6 of the 8 providers publish a rate covering the 100 GB this index prices, so the month can be totalled from the page. The vendor publishes a rate for the volume this index prices, so a buyer can total the month before speaking to anyone. The other 2 cannot be totalled at that volume, and the reason differs:
- IPRoyal: IPRoyal publishes residential rates up to 10 GB and then jumps straight to a custom plan its own page says begins at 10 TB. At the 100 GB this index prices there is no published rate to use, so nothing is computed for it.
- Zyte: Zyte does not sell rotating residential bandwidth by the gigabyte at all. It prices successful responses instead, so there is no per-GB figure on its own page and none is constructed for it here.
| Provider | What it publishes | Residential rates on the page | What its own page shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evomi | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 5 https://evomi.com/pricing |
|
| SOAX | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 5 https://soax.com/pricing |
|
| Webshare | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 4 https://www.webshare.io/pricing |
|
| IPRoyal | Publishes a headline rate and a gap verified 2026-08-07 | 5 https://iproyal.com/pricing/ |
|
| Decodo | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 5 https://decodo.com/proxies/residential-proxies/pricing |
|
| Bright Data | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 4 https://brightdata.com/pricing/proxy-network |
|
| Oxylabs | Publishes the rate at the volume you buy verified 2026-08-07 | 4 https://oxylabs.io/pricing |
|
| Zyte | Publishes no per-GB rate verified 2026-08-07 | 0 https://www.zyte.com/pricing/ |
|
The one rate card here that needs a code
Bright Data prints a struck-through rate beside every published residential rate, and prints the code RESIGB50 on the same card rather than applying it. So its published rates are code prices: a buyer who does not type the code pays roughly double. RangeYourself’s standing rule is to rank on the price you can actually pay today, so the discounted rate is the one this site ranks — and the code is named every single time that rate appears, including here. What the page does not state is how long the offer lasts, and we do not guess.
Why a wide gap is not a criticism
Quoting an enterprise rate in marketing is ordinary practice across every infrastructure category, and every figure on this page comes from the provider that published it. A wide gap tells you how much arithmetic the pricing page leaves to you before you can budget. It tells you nothing about success rates, pool quality, latency or how a network sources its addresses — which are the things that actually decide a proxy purchase, which no pricing page can answer, and which we have not tested at any provider in this index.
It is worth naming the provider that does the opposite of hiding this: IPRoyal publishes the volume its own advertised rate requires, directly beneath the rate. It is the only provider in this index that does, and the effect is that its advertised figure can be read correctly by anyone, which is more than can be said for the rest of the category.
How this is verified
Every rate on this page was read from the provider’s own pricing page and is stored with that page’s URL, a verbatim quote, and the date it was checked (most recent: August 7, 2026). Where a provider publishes no rate at a volume, we say so instead of extrapolating one from a rate it publishes somewhere else. A rate the provider itself prefixes with “from” is printed as a floor, because that is the provider’s own distinction and not ours. Where a provider is currently discounting, both its list rate and the rate you can actually pay today are printed, and the ranking follows the one you can actually pay. Totals are arithmetic on published rates and published tier allowances only. See our editorial standards and how we verify.
Which providers are in it. The residential-proxy and web-data providers an English-speaking buyer is most likely to shortlist, chosen before any rate was read and not filtered afterwards. A provider whose rate card is unreadable or whose product is not purchasable stays out rather than being listed as though it were an option, and the reason is recorded in `removed` rather than left as a silent gap.
What the scenario is. Chosen before any rate was read: a volume small enough that a working scraper reaches it in a month and large enough that the tier discounts in this category start to bite. It is arithmetic on published rates and published tier allowances only, never a quote. Where a vendor publishes a tier whose included allowance covers the volume, that tier's monthly amount is the cost; where it publishes a rate with no minimum, the cost is the rate times the volume; the cheaper of the two is used. At that volume the field runs from $49 to $500 a month.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the proxy price I see advertised never the price I pay?
Usually because the advertised figure is the cell in a tier table behind the largest plan the provider sells. That is not deception and every provider here publishes both figures on its own site; they are simply never printed next to each other. Across the providers in this index that advertise a per-GB rate, the gap between it and the rate a new buyer pays for the same product runs from 1.0 times at Evomi to 5.9 times at SOAX, verified August 7, 2026. Evomi is the exception: its advertised rate carries no commitment at all.
Which proxy provider has the smallest gap between its advertised and real price?
Evomi, at 1.0 times: it advertises $0.49 a GB and its cheapest way in is $0.49. Verified August 7, 2026. That is a statement about how the two figures relate, not about which provider is cheapest: Evomi is 1 of 6 on what 100 GB actually costs.
What does a proxy provider’s advertised rate usually require?
One of three things, and each provider states which on its own page (or, at one provider, nothing at all): a monthly commitment (Bright Data at $1,999 a month, Oxylabs at $2,500 a month, Decodo at $2,000 a month, SOAX at $3,000 a month, Webshare at $4,200 a month and Evomi at $49.99 a month), a stated volume floor with no monthly amount attached, or a coupon code the page prints rather than applies. 1 provider here is in the last category.
Do any proxy providers publish a rate at the volume I want to buy?
6 of the 8 publish a rate covering 100 GB in a month: Evomi, Webshare, Decodo, SOAX, Bright Data and Oxylabs. The other 2 do not, and this page names why for each rather than extrapolating a rate from a tier that does not reach the volume.
Is a provider with a wide advertised-to-real gap a bad provider?
Nothing here should be read that way. Quoting an enterprise rate in marketing is normal in every infrastructure category, and every figure on this page is published by the provider itself. The gap tells you how much homework the pricing page leaves you, not how good the network is. We have not tested any of these networks and make no claim about how any of them performs.
Residential Proxy Cost Index · Proxies with no monthly minimum · Bright Data vs Oxylabs · How much does Bright Data cost?