Proposal Software Cost Index
Updated August 6, 2026 · 8 tools checked against their own pricing pages
The subscription is not the cost. 4 of the 8 tools in this index take a cut of every client payment that passes through them, and on $20,000 of monthly billing that cut is larger than any subscription on the page. So this index ranks on what a firm of 3 actually pays — subscription plus the vendor’s own fee on the money — and prints the subscription beside it. Among the 2 vendors that publish the whole charge rather than a slice of it, the firm’s share of card fees runs from $50 on Anchor to $503 on Ignition — and the gap is smaller than it looks, because Anchor states that its card fee is borne by the client instead, at $583 a month. The remaining 4 tools charge nothing on payments because they do not process any. Every figure is quoted from the vendor’s own page and dated.
The subscription is not the cost. 4 of the 8 tools here take a cut of every client payment that passes through them, and 2 of those publish the whole charge; the other 2 publish their own share and point at the payment processor for the rest, so no all-in figure for them appears on this site. Where a vendor states that a fee is borne by the client rather than the firm, it is reported in its own column and never folded into the firm’s total — and never dropped either, because it is still a real cost of collecting the money.
RangeYourself has no affiliate relationship with any tool on this page as of August 6, 2026: every link here goes straight to the vendor’s own site and earns us nothing. We may pursue one in this category, and if we do we will say so here. Either way the ordering follows published prices and published fees, and a vendor that pays nothing is listed on exactly the same basis as one that does. See how we make money and our editorial standards.
What a firm of 3 actually pays
Ranked by the total the firm pays month to month, cheapest first, priced across one identical month: a three-person firm with thirty active clients collecting twenty thousand dollars a month across ten payments of two thousand dollars. The last column is the one no other comparison in this category carries — what the vendor itself says the client pays, which is a real cost of collecting the money even though it never appears on the firm’s invoice.
| # | Tool | Subscription for 3, month to month | What the firm pays on $20,000 of card payments | Total the firm pays a month | What the vendor says the client pays |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nusii The only tool in this set that asks for a card before a free trial starts, and the only one publishing its annual price as a yearly total. | $49/mo Agency · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $49/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 2 | Anchor The only tool here charging no subscription at all, and the only one taking a flat fee out of every payment you receive. | $0/mo Anchor · one price for the account | $50/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $50/mo verified 2026-08-06 | $583/mo the vendor states this is borne by the client, not the firm |
| 3 | Better Proposals The cheapest per-seat entry price in this set, on a tier that will only ever hold one person. | $87/mo Premium · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 3 | Proposify Puts a quarterly commitment in the slot every other tool uses for a month-to-month price. | $87/mo Basic · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 5 | PandaDoc The only tool that publishes its own payments markup as exactly zero, and the only one whose free tier states two different allowances on the same page. | $105/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $0/mo PandaDoc’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $105/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 6 | Qwilr The only tool here setting a seat floor, and the only one whose payment fee falls as the tier rises. | $147/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $50/mo Qwilr’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $197/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 7 | GoProposal The only tool here whose published dollar figures are a currency conversion of prices it sets in pounds. | $255/mo Premium · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $255/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| 8 | Ignition Prices per account rather than per seat, and publishes the whole payments fee schedule rather than its own share of it. | $149/mo Core · one price for the account | $503/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $652/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
The same month, collected by bank transfer
For the vendors that publish a separate bank or ACH rate, this is the single largest lever in the category and it has nothing to do with which tool you pick. The ordering changes because one vendor caps its bank-transfer fee per transaction and the card rate has no equivalent.
| Tool | Subscription for 3, month to month | What the firm pays on $20,000 of bank payments | Total the firm pays a month | What the vendor says the client pays |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nusii The only tool in this set that asks for a card before a free trial starts, and the only one publishing its annual price as a yearly total. | $49/mo Agency · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $49/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Anchor The only tool here charging no subscription at all, and the only one taking a flat fee out of every payment you receive. | $0/mo Anchor · one price for the account | $50/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $50/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Better Proposals The cheapest per-seat entry price in this set, on a tier that will only ever hold one person. | $87/mo Premium · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Proposify Puts a quarterly commitment in the slot every other tool uses for a month-to-month price. | $87/mo Basic · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| PandaDoc The only tool that publishes its own payments markup as exactly zero, and the only one whose free tier states two different allowances on the same page. | $105/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $300/mo PandaDoc’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $405/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Qwilr The only tool here setting a seat floor, and the only one whose payment fee falls as the tier rises. | $147/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $147/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| GoProposal The only tool here whose published dollar figures are a currency conversion of prices it sets in pounds. | $255/mo Premium · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $255/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Ignition Prices per account rather than per seat, and publishes the whole payments fee schedule rather than its own share of it. | $149/mo Core · one price for the account | $50/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $199/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
Ranked on subscription alone, for comparison
This is the number every other comparison in this category publishes, and it is a fair answer to a different question: what the software costs if you never collect a payment through it. On that basis the order is almost reversed at the top.
| Tool | Subscription for 3, month to month | What the firm pays on $20,000 of card payments | Total the firm pays a month | What the vendor says the client pays |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anchor The only tool here charging no subscription at all, and the only one taking a flat fee out of every payment you receive. | $0/mo Anchor · one price for the account | $50/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $50/mo verified 2026-08-06 | $583/mo the vendor states this is borne by the client, not the firm |
| Nusii The only tool in this set that asks for a card before a free trial starts, and the only one publishing its annual price as a yearly total. | $49/mo Agency · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $49/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Better Proposals The cheapest per-seat entry price in this set, on a tier that will only ever hold one person. | $87/mo Premium · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Proposify Puts a quarterly commitment in the slot every other tool uses for a month-to-month price. | $87/mo Basic · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $87/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| PandaDoc The only tool that publishes its own payments markup as exactly zero, and the only one whose free tier states two different allowances on the same page. | $105/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $0/mo PandaDoc’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $105/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Qwilr The only tool here setting a seat floor, and the only one whose payment fee falls as the tier rises. | $147/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $50/mo Qwilr’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $197/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Ignition Prices per account rather than per seat, and publishes the whole payments fee schedule rather than its own share of it. | $149/mo Core · one price for the account | $503/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $652/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| GoProposal The only tool here whose published dollar figures are a currency conversion of prices it sets in pounds. | $255/mo Premium · one price for the account | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $255/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
Every payment fee any vendor publishes
Four different shapes, which is why nobody publishes them side by side: a percentage of the transaction, a flat amount per payment received whatever its size, a platform fee layered on a third party’s rate, and an explicit zero markup with a minimum charge. Two of the 4 publish the whole charge; the other 2 publish their own share and point at the processor for the rest.
| Tool | Charge | Shape | Who pays it | Is this the whole fee? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ignition | Credit or debit card, domestic “"ccDomesticPercentage":"2.5"” | 2.5% plus $0.3 on card payments | The firm | Yes the vendor publishes the full charge |
| Ignition | Bank account, ACH or direct debit “"bankAccountPercentage":"1"” | 1% plus $0.3 capped at $5 on bank payments | The firm | Yes the vendor publishes the full charge |
| PandaDoc | PandaDoc's own markup on card payments through Stripe “PandaDoc transaction fee: $0.00 (subject to change).” | 0% on card payments | The firm | No the vendor’s own share only; it points at the payment processor for the rest and does not restate that rate |
| PandaDoc | Pay by Bank (ACH) through Stripe “Payments settle in 2–4 business days at up to 1.5% per transaction” | 1.5% on bank payments | The firm | No the vendor’s own share only; it points at the payment processor for the rest and does not restate that rate |
| Anchor | Anchor's fee on each payment received “When you receive a payment, and only then, Anchor deducts $5 from the funds you receive.” | $5 a payment, whatever its size applies to a payment however it is made | The firm | Yes the vendor publishes the full charge |
| Anchor | Credit or debit card fee “2.9% + $0.30 Credit/Debit Card Fee” | 2.9% plus $0.3 on card payments | The client | Yes the vendor publishes the full charge |
| Qwilr | QwilrPay application fee, Starter “QwilrPay Application Fee: This may appear as an "application fee" or "platform fee" in the Stripe invoice. This is the fee that Qwilr charges, per transaction, for access to QwilrPay. At a base level: Starter: 0.25% per transaction” | 0.25% on card payments | The firm | No the vendor’s own share only; it points at the payment processor for the rest and does not restate that rate |
Who bears it matters as much as the rate. Anchor states that a card fee is paid by the client rather than the firm. That is not a saving, it is a transfer, and this index keeps the two sides in separate columns rather than adding them together or dropping the one that does not land on the firm.
The tools that take nothing on payments
4 of the 8, and it is the correct state for what they are: proposal and document software that hands the payment to a processor you set up yourself. Their pricing pages say so.
- GoProposal: GoProposal publishes no payment-processing fee of its own, and its pricing page contains no reference to collecting client payments at all. That is the expected state for a tool that produces proposals and engagement letters rather than billing through them, and it is not opacity.“30-day Free Trial”
- Proposify: Proposify publishes no payment-processing rate of its own. Its pricing page names Stripe only in the context of PCI compliance, and states no percentage or fixed fee anywhere.“Proposify uses Stripe to process payments. Stripe has been audited by a PCI-certified auditor and is certified to PCI Service Provider Level 1.”
- Better Proposals: Better Proposals publishes no payment-processing fee of its own. It names Stripe, GoCardless and PayPal as integrations and states no rate for any of them, which is the expected state for a tool that hands the payment to a processor rather than billing through itself.“Integrate with Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal and get paid directly from your documents.”
- Nusii: Nusii publishes no payment-processing rate of its own. Its pricing page links to a Stripe integration page and states no percentage or fixed fee anywhere.“Try any Nusii plan for 14 days free.”
Per seat or per account, and what that does to a growing firm
The split is even: 4 of the 8 charge per user (Proposify, PandaDoc, Better Proposals and Qwilr) and 4 charge once for the account (Ignition, GoProposal, Anchor and Nusii). For a firm of 3 the difference is modest; by ten people it is the whole comparison, because an account price stops moving and a seat price does not. Qwilr is the only tool here that also set a minimum seat count on at least one tier, so a small firm buying that tier pays for seats nobody occupies.
When a monthly price is not a monthly price
Three things on these pages change what a figure means, and all three are the vendor’s own presentation rather than anything hidden. 3 of the 8 pricing pages load with the annual option already selected, so the lower figure is the one most visitors remember.
- Proposify, Team: the figure in the non-annual slot is billed quarterly, not monthly. “$49 per user/mo billed quarterly.”
- Qwilr, Growth: sold on annual billing only, so it has no month-to-month price at all. “Growth ($55 per user per month) and Scale ($75 per user per month) are available on annual billing only.”
- Qwilr, Scale: sold on annual billing only, so it has no month-to-month price at all. “Growth ($55 per user per month) and Scale ($75 per user per month) are available on annual billing only.”
- GoProposal: GoProposal publishes two different sets of figures for the same four tiers: dollars in the visible pricing table ($75 / $120 / $150 / $255) and pounds in the page's own structured data (GBP 65 / 95 / 130 / 205). The ratio between them is not constant across the tiers, so the dollar figures are not a straight conversion of the pounds and neither set can be derived from the other. Both are published here and neither is adopted.
- Nusii:the only tool here that asks for a card before a free trial starts. “You won't be charged during your trial.”
The same firm on annual billing
Committing to a year moves the subscription and, on the vendor that says so explicitly, does not move the payment fees at all.
| Tool | Subscription for 3, billed annually | What the firm pays on $20,000 of card payments | Total the firm pays a month | What the vendor says the client pays |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nusii The only tool in this set that asks for a card before a free trial starts, and the only one publishing its annual price as a yearly total. | $40.83/mo Agency · one price for the account · divided out of a yearly total | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $40.83/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Anchor The only tool here charging no subscription at all, and the only one taking a flat fee out of every payment you receive. | $0/mo Anchor · one price for the account | $50/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $50/mo verified 2026-08-06 | $583/mo the vendor states this is borne by the client, not the firm |
| PandaDoc The only tool that publishes its own payments markup as exactly zero, and the only one whose free tier states two different allowances on the same page. | $57/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $0/mo PandaDoc’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $57/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Proposify Puts a quarterly commitment in the slot every other tool uses for a month-to-month price. | $57/mo Basic · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $57/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Better Proposals The cheapest per-seat entry price in this set, on a tier that will only ever hold one person. | $63/mo Premium · 3 seats billed | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | $63/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Qwilr The only tool here setting a seat floor, and the only one whose payment fee falls as the tier rises. | $105/mo Starter · 3 seats billed | $50/mo Qwilr’s own share only — it does not publish the processor’s rate | At least $155/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| Ignition Prices per account rather than per seat, and publishes the whole payments fee schedule rather than its own share of it. | $99/mo Core · one price for the account | $503/mo the whole fee, published by the vendor | $602/mo verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
| GoProposal The only tool here whose published dollar figures are a currency conversion of prices it sets in pounds. | Not available checked 2026-08-06 | Nothing publishes no payment fee of its own | Not calculable verified 2026-08-06 | Nothing the vendor states the client pays |
Vendor-stated details worth knowing before you buy
Each of these comes from the vendor’s own page or is a plain reading of what it publishes. None is a claim about how any tool performs.
- Ignition: Ignition meters on active clients with signed agreements, not on documents or seats. A firm that outgrows a tier's client allowance pays a per-client rate that falls as the tier rises, from $7 on Solo to $2 on Pro+, so the cheapest tier is the most expensive place to add a client.
- Ignition: The Solo tier includes one user account. A two-person firm cannot buy it and has to move to Core, which is three times the price rather than a seat more.
- Ignition: Payment rates are charged monthly at the prevailing rate whatever the subscription term. Ignition says so directly: committing to a year fixes the subscription price and not the fee on the money.
- Ignition: Ignition's bank-transfer fee is capped at $5.00 a transaction. On a $2,000 invoice that is the difference between roughly $5 and roughly $50 against the card rate, which is a larger decision than the choice of tier.
- GoProposal: GoProposal publishes two different figures for each tier: dollars in the visible table and pounds in the page's own structured data ($75 against GBP 65, $120 against GBP 95, $150 against GBP 130, $255 against GBP 205). The ratio is not the same on any two tiers, so neither set is a conversion of the other and quoting one as the other's equivalent would be wrong in both directions.
- GoProposal: The published prices exclude VAT, which the page states on every card. For a UK buyer that is a real addition to the number shown.
- GoProposal: GoProposal's two cheapest tiers include a single user each and it publishes no per-extra-seat rate, so a three-person firm's cheapest option is its top tier rather than the entry one.
- GoProposal: It meters on proposals rather than on clients or seats: 5 on Solo, 10 on Basic, 50 on Standard and unlimited on Premium. That is a different meter from every other tool in this index.
- GoProposal: There is no annual billing option on this page at all, so there is no annual saving to compare against the rest of this set.
- Proposify: The $49 figure on the Team tier is billed quarterly, not monthly. Proposify labels it, and it sits in the position a reader scanning four pricing pages will take for the month-to-month price.
- Proposify: Proposify meters on documents SENT, with a per-send overage on every tier. Ten sends a month on the entry tier is a real constraint for a firm that proposes frequently.
- Proposify: The overage rate does not fall with the tier the way the rest of the category's do: it is $0.50 a send on Basic, $0.30 on Team, and $0.75 on Business, which is the highest of the three.
- PandaDoc: PandaDoc's free tier is described two ways on the same page: the marketing card says 60 documents a year and the detailed comparison table says 5 documents and 5 eSignatures a month. Those are not the same allowance and RangeYourself publishes both rather than choosing.
- PandaDoc: PandaDoc's published payments fee is its own markup, stated as $0.00 with a $0.50 minimum. It is not the cost of taking a card payment: the processor's percentage is set by Stripe and PandaDoc does not publish it, so no all-in figure for PandaDoc appears on this site.
- PandaDoc: The per-extra-document rate is higher on monthly billing than on annual ($3.50 against $2 on Starter), so the billing term changes the overage as well as the seat price.
- Better Proposals: The Starter tier is capped at one user seat. It is the cheapest published seat price in this set and it is not available to a firm of two, so a per-seat comparison that starts there compares a solo product with a team one.
- Better Proposals: Both cheaper tiers cap documents sent per month, at 10 and 50. Unlimited sending starts on the top tier.
- Better Proposals: betterproposals.io/pricing/ with a trailing slash returns 404. The working page has no trailing slash.
- Anchor: Anchor's flat $5 per payment received is independent of the payment's size, so it is proportionally punishing on small invoices and negligible on large ones. On a $200 payment it is 2.5%; on a $5,000 payment it is 0.1%. Nothing else in this set behaves that way.
- Anchor: The 2.9% + $0.30 card fee is stated as paid by the client, not by the firm. That is a real cost of collecting the money and it lands on somebody; this site keeps the two sides separate rather than adding or hiding either.
- Anchor: Bank transfers are listed at $0, so the choice of payment method changes the total far more than any subscription decision in this category.
- Anchor: There is no free trial because there is nothing to trial against: the product has no subscription fee to begin with.
- Qwilr: Qwilr's two upper tiers are sold on annual billing only, so there is no month-to-month price for them at all. Its FAQ also states annual plans are paid upfront for the full twelve months.
- Qwilr: Growth starts at 5 seats and Scale at 10, so a three-person firm that needs a Growth feature buys five seats. Qwilr is the only tool in this set that sets a floor under the seat count.
- Qwilr: Qwilr's payment fee is its own application fee only. Stripe's processing rate sits on top of it and Qwilr does not publish that, so no all-in figure for Qwilr appears on this site.
- Qwilr: The free-document allowance is per month with a per-document rate beyond it: $5 a document on Starter and $2.50 on the upper tiers.
- Nusii: Nusii asks for a card before the trial starts, which no other tool in this set does. It says plainly that nothing is charged during the trial.
- Nusii: The annual price is published as a yearly total rather than a per-month figure, so a per-month annual rate for Nusii on this site is that total divided by twelve and is labelled as such.
- Nusii: Nusii meters on ACTIVE proposals rather than on sends: 5 on the entry tier, 20 on the middle one. An old proposal left open counts against the allowance in a way a send-metered tool's does not.
- Nusii: Extra seats are priced per tier rather than uniformly, at $19 on Agency and $29 on Business, so adding a person costs more on the more expensive plan.
How this index is verified
Every figure on this page was read from the vendor’s own page and is stored with that page’s URL, a verbatim quote, and the date it was checked (most recent: August 6, 2026). 2 of these 8 pricing pages could not be read with a plain HTTP request and were read in a browser at the same URL, with each billing option selected in turn. Payment fees are only counted against a firm where the vendor states the firm bears them; where a vendor states the client bears one, it is published separately rather than added or hidden. Where a vendor publishes only its own share of a payment fee and points at a processor for the rest, no all-in total is computed, because the vendor has not published one. Totals are arithmetic on published figures only, and where a vendor prints a yearly total but no monthly equivalent, dividing that total by twelve is labelled where it appears. See our editorial standards and how we verify.
Which tools are in it. The eight proposal and engagement-billing tools an accounting, consulting or agency buyer is most likely to shortlist, chosen before any price was read and not filtered afterwards. The set deliberately spans both halves of the category: tools that produce a proposal and hand the payment to somebody else, and tools that bill the client through the proposal themselves. Nobody is excluded for being expensive, for charging nothing, or for paying nothing.
What the scenario is. Chosen before the fees were read: a firm size every vendor in this set sells to, and a payment volume above the point where a percentage fee and a flat fee diverge, so the difference between the two pricing shapes is visible rather than hidden. It is arithmetic on published rates, not a quote.
Frequently asked questions
How much does proposal software cost?
For a firm of 3 paying month to month, published subscriptions in this index run from $0 to $255 a month, verified August 6, 2026. That is only half the question: 4 of the 8 tools also charge on client payments collected through them, and on $20,000 a month those charges range up to $503 — more than any subscription here.
Which proposal tools charge payment processing fees?
4 of the 8: Ignition, PandaDoc, Anchor and Qwilr. The other 4 publish none — GoProposal, Proposify, Better Proposals and Nusii — because they produce proposals and hand the payment to a processor you set up separately. That is a product difference, not a disclosure one, and nothing here treats it as opacity.
Which tools publish the full cost of collecting a payment?
Only 2 of the 8: Ignition and Anchor. 2 more publish their own share and point at the payment processor for the rest — PandaDoc and Qwilr — so no all-in figure for those appears on this site. Publishing a zero markup honestly, as one of them does, is a good disclosure; it is still not the price of taking a card payment.
Is proposal software priced per user or per account?
Both, and the split is even: 4 of the 8 charge per seat and 4 charge one price for the account. That single difference decides more than any headline figure for a growing firm — a per-account tier stops costing more as people join, and a per-seat one does not. 1 of the 8 also set a minimum seat count on at least one tier.
What is the cheapest proposal software?
On subscription for a firm of 3, Anchor at $0 a month, verified August 6, 2026. Read the fee column before treating that as the answer: the cheapest subscription in this index belongs to a tool that charges a flat fee on every payment it collects instead, and the cheapest tools after it do not collect payments at all.
Do these prices include the payment processor’s fees?
A payment fee is only counted against a firm where the vendor states the firm bears it. Where a vendor states the client bears it, the amount is published and reported separately rather than added to the firm's total or quietly dropped. Where a vendor publishes only its own share and points at a payment processor for the rest, its share is shown and no all-in total is computed, because the vendor has not published one.
How are these figures verified?
Each one is read from the vendor's own page and stored with that URL, a verbatim quote, and the date it was checked (most recent: August 6, 2026). 2 of these 8 pricing pages could not be read with a plain HTTP request and were read in a browser at the same URL with each billing option selected in turn. Nothing is estimated, and no payment processor's published rate is ever substituted for a vendor that declines to state one.
Proposal software payment processing fees · Proposal software under $50 a month · How much does Ignition cost? · Is Ignition worth it?